Skip to main content
Logo

predicate.

Don't fuck with gorillas unless your Kung-Fu is strong.
  • irc
  • webmail
  • mixtape

You are here

Home

Save Internet Radio

published by misskaz on Tue, 04/17/2007 - 9:12am

The Copyright Royalty Board recently announced a decision to change the royalty structure for internet radio stations. The new structure (pushed of course by SoundExchange and the RIAA) will be retroactive to 2006, and has been estimated to increase royalty fees for many internet radio stations by 300% - 1200%. Many stations are claiming they will become bankrupt from the retroactive fees alone. Pandora and NPR are among the organizations that have opposed this change, but yesterday a panel of judges rejected their appeals.

Savenetradio.org has a handy page where you can automatically send message to your representatives in Congress. I have no idea if this does any good, but it seems more useful than signing a lame petition.

Do it.

  • Log in to post comments

Comments

I wrote my Senator. Here's what she said:

Permalink Submitted by Osomatic on Mon, 04/23/2007 - 4:12pm.

This is from Dianne Feinstein, by the way.

Thank you for writing to me with your concerns about the Copyright Royalty Board's recent decision on the statutory rate for music webcasting. I understand your concerns and appreciate the opportunity to respond.

Under the Copyright Royalty and Distribution Reform Act of 2004, Congress - at the behest of webcasters - created the Copyright Royalty Board which consists of three judges. By law, the judges are a venue of last resort and are required to periodically set rates for various statutory copyright licenses in the event that webcasters and copyright owners are unable to reach voluntary agreements. In the absence of an agreement, the judges set a rate designed to approximate the fair-market value that webcasters should pay to artists and performers for streaming their music for the years 2006-2010. The new rate that was established is less than a 5 percent increase of the rate in effect from 1998-2005.

Although a few webcasters have recently claimed that the process was unfair, it was not arbitrary and allowed representatives from all sides to make their cases. The judges began the proceedings in 2005, and heard testimony from dozens of witnesses and conducted a comprehensive review of tens of thousands of pages of evidence submitted by all interested parties over an 18-month period.

While some webcasters may choose to pay this rate, independent negotiations between the parties are still possible and this new statutory rate would serve as the ceiling. Additionally, if it appears that the new rate will reduce the overall amount of webcasting - as well as the overall income from this stream of revenue - the copyright owners may still have an incentive to offer webcasters a rate less than the statutory rate.

I am a strong believer in intellectual property rights and believe that artists and performers have earned the right to be fairly compensated for the broadcast of their works by webcasters who benefit - financially and otherwise - from their talents. Without fair compensation, these artists would not create their works.

So there you have it... discuss.

  • Log in to post comments

It seems to me that there's

Permalink Submitted by Ajax on Mon, 04/23/2007 - 5:30pm.

It seems to me that there's a fairly significant difference between "a less than 5% increase" (per Sen. Feinstein) and "a 300% - 1200% increase" (per misskaz's source). Knowing how those numbers were arrived at would probably help me decide who's being disingenuous.

  • Log in to post comments

Agreed, Ajax. I wish I

Permalink Submitted by Osomatic on Tue, 04/24/2007 - 2:35pm.

Agreed, Ajax. I wish I knew, but I don't. I just want there to keep being Pandora.

  • Log in to post comments

User login

What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Request new password

Navigation

  • Bot
  • Dialectic
  • Predicomic
  • Taglines

Recent comments

  • Mistakes were made. - 5 days ago
  • Knowhatimean? - 1 month ago
  • Bandnames! - 1 month ago
  • Topicality! - 1 month ago
  • Tagline achievements - 1 month ago
  • Emperor of Taglines - 1 month ago
  • Changes - 1 month ago
  • Divisional races - 2 months ago
  • Streak ends! - 2 months ago
  • Stabby Action is #1; all others are #2, or lower. - 2 months ago
more

Poll

Proposition: Predicate needs to have another convention.
Uh, sure, why not... [and I think _________________ would be a capital location.]
92%
Look what happened last time.
8%
I will catch the first dogsled to Ice Station Zebra right after hell freezes over.
0%
Total votes: 12
  • Older polls
Theme provided by Danetsoft under GPL license from Danang Probo Sayekti